Questions for Textual Critics
“Awake
to righteousness, and sin not;
for
some have not the knowledge of God”
1
Cor 15:34
Bible
“Textual Critics” are like Anthropologists: They
believe that the Bible follows an EVOLUTIONARY process. Sort of an initial
“Big Bang” and the puzzle was then assembled in time!
That is, God inspired the “original” perfect
and inerrant, but having failed to find an infallible way to protect it from
Satan’s attack, soon lost control over part of it and corruption set in. Unable
to detect the initial problem, God only realized the deteriorating situation
much later when it was ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE to recover what was lost.
Hence, the effort to attempt to salvage the “original”
20 centuries later, with the help of man (actually, Man, as it can
be found in John 9:35 in modern versions!), that is, the “Bible scientific
Textual Critic”!
Some already say that the “original” Bible will
be found soon with the help of computers. That is, once all the available data is
collected and processed in a computer, the true Bible will reappear (but,
of course, after a while, the “Computer” will produce the first updated
revision!!)! Naturally, all this implies very strongly that the church
of Jesus Christ never had the complete Bible, and God is to blame for the
situation!
Since that true Bible is not yet available, and since
God’s Holy Character in on the line, that is, God is still in trouble for
His carelessness regarding His original Blueprint, the “Textual
Critics” insist that at this juncture in the Church’s History,
the question of “original preservation” is defined this way: God lost
the First Script! Hence, the [APOSTATE!] church adopting the “Preference Stance”, that is, a Christian does
not have any other option but to do his best with what is at hand: CHOOSE
(from among a few dozen “good” versions) a preference and USE it the
best he can!
Yet, because many Christians believe that God NEVER
lost His original Masterpiece, and they insist that in English the Authorized
Version is that Bible, AND THEY FIGHT TO KEEP IT, the “Textual Critics” have launched a campaign to DISCREDIT
and ATTACK that particular Bible Translation and call those Christians a sectarian
cult.
Those Christians, on the other hand, are no cowards
and FIGHT to keep their valuable Sword. They have already [MANY TIMES!] DEFEATED the
“Textual Critics” for the important FACT
that they have in their hands the real Sword of the Spirit of God, His inerrant and infallible
word, and the battle is, after all, a simple squeamish between that STRONG
sword made of hardened steel against a “COLLECTION” of small toy-swords
made of third grade recycled plastic!
Textual critics are religious actors always rehearsing the same fictitious
act and never upholding the godliness required by God Almighty. “But refuse
profane and old wives’ fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness”,
1 Tim 4:7.
Look at the amount of modern “bible” versions
in circulation, ALL tampering with the Scriptures and none being in any way
near the “standard” the church would require.
One hundred of those “actors” presumptuously assembled the NIV and
then, realizing that the work was a total worthless flop, not only CONDEMNED
it, but also included in the condemnation ALL other modern “translations”
done by other such self-appointed critics. Read carefully the last paragraph
of the NIV’s Preface and see for yourself. The authors of such dishonouring
work even blaspheme, giving glory to God for the mess they created!
In the past, pastors explained the Scriptures under
the conviction that God was watching, rewards godliness and all the honour
should be given to Him. Today is not like that. Here comes the ACTOR
learned in “Textual Criticism” with all his arrogance, questioning
the readings and offering his leanings and views.
As I see it, the modern “Textual critic” is a desperately wicked element
in the environment of the apostate Christian Church.
He is a highly poisonous species of tares, breeding easily in the
fertile ground of apostasy, among the weak wheat, suffocating any good seed
with his poisonous exhalations.
This individual thrusts all his evil agnosticism upon
his victims, who are the common unaware Christians, naively assuming that
it is safe to accept the direction he points out (pointing spiritual true
north to south!).
This deceiving critic is guilty of attacking the Scriptures
and robbing them from his uninformed victims.
No church group can ever prosper in the spiritual realm
giving any ground to such vicious and damned ACTOR.
The textual critic is the modern Judas
Iscariot, earning a living in a community that he victimizes and will
end betraying.
He is the thief who steals the goods from his friends,
in this case, the Holy Bible.
This is the enemy of spiritual innocence, ready to
offer the baby in Christ a “COLLECTION” of his “bible products” and
never agreeing that the new Christian is incapable of understanding why he
needs so many “bibles” to be able to read the Scriptures without the
critic’s help.
The textual critic represents the height in hypocritical
deception. He believes no Scriptures. His approach to the Bible is to question
each paragraph and reshape the meaning of each word. He lies with no remorse
at the slightest challenge. There
is no final authority in any book on earth, he is sure of it. Yet, being sure
that he cannot be sure of anything, he wishes to tower himself above God’s
word and accept the ovation!
The following questions to “Textual Critics” are only a small “anthology” of
“thoughts” to make the “Critic” aware of his fragile plastic standing. Some
questions they could answer right away, but they will not, for FEAR of ridicule
and disapproval from colleagues in the same SCHOLARSHIP CULT!
……………………………
2. You say that there is no perfect translation of the Bible. Was that some revelation you received from the Holy Spirit, the Author of Scripture, or did you get it from another man?
3. If no translation
is perfect, what is then perfect in Christianity?
4. If God took care
of 98% in the best translation, why did He leave out only two percent?
5. Was the Holy Spirit,
the Author of Scripture, not fully interested in PRESERVING the Scriptures
pure in English?
6. Can the Christians
absolutely (100%!) trust what the scholars say?
7. When a scholar translates from the “original” into English, is his translation ALSO imperfect?
10. Why do scholars discount the Holy
Spirit’s involvement in the Authorized translation?
11. Why
do scholars never suspect the devil’s interference to corrupt the modern versions?
12. How
do you explain to a new Christian that the most successful period of the Church
History was when the English church used the Authorized Version?
13. How
do you account for the fact that there never was any true revival with the
“better” versions available today?
14. If
God lost part of His inspired Script, why had He to wait until the 20th
century to attempt to recover it with the help of man?
15. Since
a new convert has no chance in any liberal church to stick to the standard
Bible in English, which version do you recommend as the best for him and why?
16. If there are two types of bibles, based on two “families” of manuscripts, was the Devil in any way involved in attacking the Bible?
18. Do you believe a Christian should
always speak the truth IN CHRIST, not lie, according to 1 Timothy 2:7, in
the KJV? Do you believe Satan attacked that particular verse, or do you think
Paul never wrote it like that?
19. Do you like the NWT? If not,
tell us why.
20. If we live in the Laodicean
period of Church History, why would the church need to recover the “original”
Bible?
21. When the RV came to life, why
was it NOT a perfect translation?
22. When the NASB came to life
why did they call it the New American “Standard” without ever been read in
any church? Why “standard”? What was wrong with the old standard?
23. Why does the church need
one new “re-translation” and/or revision every six months?
24. Where in the Bible is any inference given that textual critics were appointed to do any work for the Lord?
26. Where does the Bible say
anything GOOD about textual critics?
27. When any textual critic
translates from the “original”, is it right the first time, or only after
other 99 critics have confirmed it?
28. Why does the NIV call God Almighty
TOLERANT in Romans 2:4?
29. Can you explain why the
NIV translators declare ALL translations of the Bible imperfect works (last
paragraph in its Preface)?
30. Why did the NKJV REMOVE
all the singular and plural (ye) pronouns from its text?
This in reference to the fact that the KJV translators purposely used a pronoun
arrangement which was (a) never used before or after on the street, and (b)
made clear whether you/plural or you/singular were being discussed in both
the Hebrew and the Greek.
Júlio Carrancho
October/2002
BACK TO KING JAMES CONTROVERSY PAGE
BACK TO ENTRY PAGE OF THE JOURNAL