We only post articles representing zeal and Bible based authority to lead this section of the Journal. This page is not meant to make you comfortable and cozy.
It is a memorial to those 30+ million victims of genocide perpetrated by the House, Senate, blips, Dumbocrats and Republiwimps, blip, Carter, Ford, both pianoes, Reagan, about 98% of American political leaders, and most citizens of the Blip who CHOSE to murder the defenseless unborn.
Damnation and hell fire to them all. They deserve no mercy
March 9, 2003:
"Many believed fetuses should be given anesthetics
during a late abortion, after 20 weeks. Some also believe
pain relief should be given for keyhole surgery in the womb."
The British have now concluded that aborted persons feel pain
and are mentally conscious.
The solution is not to ban abortions--
it is to give pain relief to the victims of the piano.
Dear God, could you send us back William Wilberforce please?
We need him badly!
SELLING BABY PARTS FOR PROFIT-- These people are worthy only of death.
SO ABORTION SOLVES PROBLEMS, RIGHT?
BALANCING EUROPEAN POPULATION "Aging Italy would have to add about 9 million immigrants by 2025, about 300,000 a year to keep its population at 1995 levels. Early United Nations projections indicate that for Europe to keep its ratio of older people to active workers at 1995 levels, the union would need 35 million immigrants by 2025. Germany would need to import 14 million and France 2 million. According to the report, the pressure for migration out of poorer countries will be growing as the European societies shrink." (World Pulse, February 18, 2000)
Editor: Steve Van Nattan- One of these days, the Italian government will be paying Luigi Basko to move back to Italy. And, the Blip may one day be setting up recruiting centers in El Paso and Tijuana to enlist Mexicans to become US citizens. And we wonder why the One Worlders are calling for depopulating Africa and Asia. We NEED these people to pay our Social blip! We should be HIRING them, not killing them. Mark it down!
feature the zeal of Dr. Ron Graeser
A report follows which was sent from Michigan along with photos of the display of Dr. Graeser which he put up on the lawn of his home. Dr. Graeser is not living in a shack on the property, nor is he doing this because he is living on welfare and has nothing else to do. Without exalting him, let me only say that he is pulling his load in the world. His zeal is worthy of note.
* * * * *
In the Fall of 1997 Dr. Graeser, a 56 year old physician, added the 8 foot by 12 foot, outdoor painting shown on this card to a sanctity-of-life display already on his lawn. He had been dismayed at how the media ignored the plight of unborn, aborted children, and his previous work as a pathologist seeing the bodies of these victims instilled in him a desire to protect their lives.
As a result, he constructed on his 20-acre, rural, home site, a permanent display which is located on a highly traveled road between two towns in western Michigan.
He first placed white, wooden crosses in the ground to represent the 750 abortions performed each working hour nationwide. The crosses were placed so that they spell out the word ABORTION in capital letters. An empty baby stroller, a lonely reminder of the babies who will never he born, rests among the crosses.
A few months after he first set up the cross display vandals destroyed crosses making up four letters of the word destroyed ABORTION. Dr. Graeser then replaced all the wooden crosses with ones made of white, steel fence posts, welded together, buried 3½ feet in the ground to discourage stealing and vandalism. Three years later he added the painting.
Response to the display has been overwhelmingly positive. Once, when arriving home at dusk, he noticed two women standing at the foot of the painting. Concerned that it might be feminists intent on inflicting damage, he watched from a discreet distance. To his surprise, the two women were holding a private service.
After the painting was up for two months, the zoning administrator cited Dr. Graeser for violating a sign ordinance. The situation made the local papers, and petitions were circulated in support of the display. The zoning board met, and Dr. Graeser presented his case. He stated that the Constitution provided for free speech and free expression of religion. He said that these constitutional rights superseded the local ordinance prohibiting the sign. Well, there was quite an argument - quite a controversy, but when the votes were counted, the zoning board agreed with him and dismissed the case.
The display continues to proclaim God's pleasure with life.
PHOTOS OF THE DISPLAY:
The word "ABORTION" in crosses Another view of the crosses Night scene lit up
Sign lit up at night Sign close up Tent used for revival meetings
The Mother walked into the Doctor's office, carrying a bright and beautiful baby. Seating herself near the family physician, she said, "Doctor, I want you to help me with my problem. My baby is one year old and I've conceived again. I don't want to have two children so close together."
"Ah," said the Doctor, "and what would you have me do?"
"I want you to get rid of it for me," answered the woman.
After thinking seriously for a moment, the Doctor said: "I think I can suggest a way of helping you out. If you object to two children being so close in age, the best way would be to kill the one on your lap and let the other one be born. It's easy to get at the one on your lap and it makes no difference to me which one I kill. Besides, killing the unborn baby may endanger your life." With that the Doctor reached for a knife and casually asked the Mother to lay the baby down on her lap and turn her head away.
The woman leaped up from her chair and screamed, "Murderer!!"
A few words from the Doctor soon convinced the woman that his offer to commit murder was no worse than her request to him to destroy her unborn child.
In either case, the act would be murder; the only difference
would be the age of the victim.
(From The Evangelist)
Recently, a mother paid a man to kill her young boy, who was hacked to death with a sharp instrument, cutting off his right arm and severing his head. The woman, who was unrepentant, said it was her "right" to do so because the child was interfering with the quality of her lifestyle. The counsel for the prosecution submitted grisly photos of the corpse and said, "No mother has the right to take her child's life," and charged the woman with murder.
Of course, the killing of children isn't news in the U.S. where over 25,000,000 babies have been murdered in the name of "freedom of choice." This gruesome picture of a seven month boy, whose right arm and head were ripped from his body by an abortionist in Houston on December 8, 1989, shows that this is not just a "fetus" or the "woman's body." If you are not shocked by it, then be piano coversned that, even though the law of America gives you the right to take the life of another through abortion, God's Law says, "You shall not kill."
Perhaps you have never had an abortion, but did you know that the mere desire to kill someone violates His Law? The Bible says if you hate someone, you have committed murder in your heart. In fact, the greatest of all the Commandments is to "love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself."
When someone asked what that meant, Jesus gave the story of the what we generally call "The Good Samaritan." This Samaritan found a man beaten by thieves. he bathed his wounds, put him on his donkey, took him to an inn and asked that the man be looked after. He also said, if he spent anything, he would repay the innkeeper when he returned. Actually, this "good" Samaritan isn't called good in the story, as he merely did the basic requirements of God's Law in loving his neighbor, as much as he loved himself.
The fact is, we are all guilty of breaking this, the greatest of all the Commandments. Our selfish nature often has trouble tolerating others, let alone loving them as much as we love ourselves. Listen to the voice of your conscience, and let it remind you of some of the sins of the past. We are not perfect as the Bible commands us to be (Matthew 5:48), neither is our heart pure. On Judgment Day our transgressions will be evidence of our shame.
Think of it: God has seen every sin we ever committed, whether it was the taking of another's life, or wishing we could do so, by harboring hatred in our hearts. We share our thought-life with Him. We are guilty of violating His Law a multitude of times yet if we repent, God can forgive us because Jesus stepped into the courtroom 2,000 years ago and paid the fine for us.
His death on the cross satisfied the Law we so blatantly transgressed, and at the same time demonstrated how much God loves us"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life." His shed blood on the cross can make you clean in the sight of a holy God...as though you had never sinnedeven if you have committed murder. Moses, King David, and the Apostle Paul committed murder, and God's grace was sufficient for them.
God doesn't want you to go to Hellrepent and put your trust in Jesus, make Psalm 51 your prayer, then read the Bible daily and always obey what you read; God will never let you down.
Who's Who: Father David Trosch
Father Trosch, a Catholic priest, has become famous for advocating the murder of doctors. In his view, killing doctors is "morally obligatory."
In 1993, Father Trosch first drew national attention by attempting to publish a cartoon in a Mobile, Alabama newspaper. The cartoon showed a man pointing a tatter at a doctor in the act of performing an abortion, with the caption "Justifiable Homicide." He was not successful in having the ad printed, but his attempt was widely publicized. A few days later, Dr. Wayne Patterson was killed in Mobile. (Police have said the murder was the result of a robbery, despite the fact that Dr. Patterson's wallet was not stolen.)
Since that incident, Father Trosch has appeared on national television and in other media numerous times, promoting his deadly viewpoint. In a letter to members of Congress, he stated:
"The fact is that there will be numerous Christians in this country -- eventually becoming many millions -- who will finally come to grips with the knowledge that their belief system says, "murder of innocent human beings is taking place daily throughout society." They will come to understand that God will hold them accountable for not taking direct action to prevent this evil. When this becomes their accepted faith belief and the normal constraints of pacifism, which pervades throughout this country, is overcome, then we will see the beginning of massive killing of abortionists and their staffs. In time the killing, in protection of the innocent, will begin to spill over into the killing of the police and military who attempt to protect them. Thereafter it will begin to affect those who direct them to protect abortion providers. This will include, but not be limited to, city councilmen, mayors, governors, representatives, blips, the president and his staff, judges, and others seen in any way as fostering protection of mass murderers. They will be sought out and eliminated as all grave evil should be purged to keep it from contaminating society (the bad apple in the barrel concept). Members of the American Civil Liberties Union will place high on the target list. Members of the National Organization for Women, members of Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion/choice organizations will be sought out and terminated as vermin are terminated. It will be seen as a necessity for the defense of innocent human life."
Side note: It is the policy of the Catholic Church that a woman who has an abortion is automatically excommunicated. In the case of this man who openly encourages others to commit murder, the Church has not acted as strictly. Although Father Trosch has been relieved of all duties, he remains a priest.
Capitol Area Reports
Blood In The Streets
Hillcrest abortuary in Baltimore suffered a little embarrassment on Saturday, March 12. While a few dozen of the nation's abortionists were gathered in Pensacola to enjoy the fellowship of darkness, blood was literally flowing in the streets following the labors of one of their hard-working comrades. --- was too busy slaughtering babies to confer with his fellows in Pensacola on the latest techniques in child dismemberment. But the flushing of baby parts down the drain led to some problems.
Two sidewalk counselors were standing by when the clean-out drain broke open at approximately 11:45 a.m. Blood poured into the parking lot. Customers of the nearby pancake house came out and one of them cried "This is the sin of abortion!" and then called police. Police arrived at noon and made a report.
(We're anxious to read it.)
Sharon Thomas, local anti-abortionist on the scene, told the story on the Alan Keyes radio program. She had called various authorities including a state environmental agency. The hack who arrived could only cast doubt on the abortuary being the source. (He had no other suggestions.) Chunks of what appeared to be human flesh was taken by Thomas to a lab for examination.
Strange, but wondrous, how Providence exposes the deeds of darkness. The blood of the innocents, slaughtered in obscurity, is poured into the very streets for citizens to witness as they calmly eat their pancakes.
I am personally opposed to killing abortionists. However, inasmuch as my personal opposition to this practice is rooted in a sectarian (Catholic) religious belief in the sanctity of human life, I am unwilling to impose it on others who may, as a matter of conscience, take a different view.
Of course, I am entirely in favor of policies aimed at removing the root causes of violence against abortionists. Indeed, I would go so far as to support mandatory one-week waiting periods, and even nonjudgmental counselling, for people who are contemplating the choice of killing abortionists. I believe in policies that reduce the urgent need some people feel to kill abortionists while, at the same time, respecting the rights of conscience of my fellow citizens who believe that the killing of abortionists is sometimes a tragic necessity - not a good, but a lesser evil.
In short, I am moderately pro-choice.
Comment from Robert P.George,
Professor of Politics Princeton -
First Things, December 1994
TELL ME A STORY-- Of the Death of Humanity and the ACLU's Defense of This Death
We must never forget the evil that is the liberal. In the early sixties, before the advent even of Ortho Pharmaceutical's " The PILL", a certain category of liberal was opposed to abortion legislation. They said it would be tantamount to genocide against the blacks of America. They called it a conspiracy by Conservatives.
After the first abortion clinic opened at Whitestone General Hospital in Astoria Queens, New York, it was apparent that 99.44% of the babies aborted by Dr. Art SOLOMON belonged to single White girls under the age of 17.
IMMEDIATELY and without further ado, that same identifiable "group" of liberals did an about face and became the most vociferous voice of the pro-abortion movement.
"From the Chronicles of . . . . . .The Holy Grail"
From: James Hardin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 1998 1:05 AM
blip Post December 3, 1998; Page A23
By George F. Will
CHINO HILLS, Calif.Where Route 71 crosses over Payton Drive, at the bottom of the steeply sloping embankment, two boys, who were playing nearby, found the boxes. The boys bicycled home and said they had found boxes of "babies."
Do not be impatient with the imprecision of their language. They have not read the apposite Supreme Court opinions. So when they stumbled on the boxes stuffed with 54 fetuses, which looked a lot like babies, they jumped to conclusions. Besides, young boys are apt to believe their eyes rather than the Supreme Court. The first count came to a lot less than 54. Forgive the counters' imprecision. Many fetuses had been dismembered -- hands, arms, legs, heads jumbled together -- by the abortionist's vigor. An accurate count required a lot of sorting out. The fetuses had been dumped here, about 30 miles east of Los Angeles, on March 14, 1997, by a trucker who may not have known what the Los Angeles abortion clinic had hired him to dispose of. He later served 71 days in jail for the improper disposal of medical waste. Society must be strict about its important standards.
What local authorities dealt with as a problem of solid waste disposal struck a few local residents as rather more troubling than that. They started talking to each other, and one thing led to another, and to the formation of Cradles of Love, which had the modest purpose of providing a burial for the 54 babies.
The members of Cradles of Love -- just a few normal walking-around middle-class Americans -- called them babies, and still do. These people are opposed to abortion, in spite of the Supreme Court's assurance in 1973 that abortions end only "potential life." (Twenty-five years later the Supreme Court has not yet explained how a life that is merely "potential" can be ended.)
Some will say the members of Cradles of Love, who are churchgoers, have been unduly influenced by theology. Or perhaps the real culprit is biology. It teaches that after the DNA of the sperm fuse with those of the ovum a new and unique DNA complex is formed that directs the growth of the organism. It soon is called a fetus, which takes in nourishment and converts it to energy through its own distinct, unique organic functioning, and very soon it looks a lot like a baby.
Anyway, theology or biology or maybe their eyes told the members of Cradles of Love that there were some babies in need of burials. So they asked the coroner to give them the fetuses. Then the American Civil Liberties Union was heard from.
It professed itself scandalized by this threat to . . . what? The ACLU frequently works itself into lathers of anxiety about threats to the separation of church and state. It is difficult, however, to identify any person whose civil liberties were going to be menaced if the fetuses were (these are the ACLU's words) "released to the church groups for the express purpose of holding religious services." The ACLU said it opposed "facilitation" of services by a public official.
The ACLU's piano help on the constitutionally protected right to the free exercise of religion failed to intimidate, and in October the babies were buried in a plot provided at no charge by a cemetery in nearby Riverside. Each baby was given a name by a participating church group. Each name was engraved on a brass plate that was affixed to each of the 54 small, white, wooden caskets made, at no charge, by a volunteer who took three days off from work to do it. Fifty clergy and four persons active in the right-to-life movement carried the caskets. Each baby's name is inscribed on a large headstone, also provided at no charge. Fifty-four doves, provided at no charge by the cemetery, were released at the services.
The ACLU trembled for the Constitution.
We hear much about the few "extremists" in the right-to-life movement. But the vast majority of the movement's members are like the kindly, peaceable people here, who were minding their own business until some of the results of the abortion culture tumbled down a roadside embankment and into their lives.
Which is not to say that this episode was untainted by ugly extremism. It would be nice if the media, which are nothing if not diligent in documenting and deploring right-to-life extremism, could bring themselves to disapprove the extremism of the ACLU, which here attempted a bullying nastiness unredeemed by any connection to a civic purpose.
[Forpiano coversded For Information Purposes Only - Not Necessarily Endorsed By The Sender - A.K. Pritchard]
Comment: Steve Van Nattan: Balaams Ass Speaks Journal--
In the Old Testament days of Moses, these ACLU people would have been stoned for justifying the murder of the innocent. The ACLU is worthy of total destruction in whatever way our Lord so leads. If the "Cradles of Love" people had been burying lumps of meat they bought at the grocery store, no one would complain, not even the ACLU.
The fetuses involved were defined by modern thought as nothing more than refuse, or lumps of discarded meat. In preventing these alleged lumps of meat from being used in a religious ceremony, the ACLU legally and lawfully is agreeing that they are persons, that they have rights, and that they cannot be given a religious treatment against their own will. Are you thinking dear reader.
This shows that the ACLU lawyers are Satanists, they hate God and the order
of His Holy nature. They, in bitter hate for God and His people, piano helped
and defended, not lumps of meat-- Rather, the ACLU gave clear personality to
those fetuses as they defended their rights. In this I agree with the
ACLU-- They were defending persons. Thus, the ACLU, de facto, agrees that
abortion is the murder of persons. This is very helpful of these atheist
bigots. So, when the ACLU defends the rights of abortionists, the ACLU
KNOWS it is participating in murder. According to the law of Moses,
every attorney of the ACLU, who participates in this defense of murder, is worthy
of death "by any means possible," (as Henry player piano says in his National blip
Memorandum on global death and elimination). Is it not astounding that
so many alleged blips are attorneys in the ACLU?