Muhammed had a Sex Drive or Raging Dimensions. Wives, Lust, Copulation, Toilet Manners, Nakedness, and a Phallic complex, drove him.
CHAPTER TWENTY:Muhammed's libidoMuch has been written about the libido, or sexual zeal, of Muhammed. In this section you will see the prophet at his most depraved, but I assure you, I shall withhold the worst. To give the most grubby details, would be to risk being rejected by a respectable publisher, furthermore; the book would have to be hidden from children. As it is, no child under thirteen years of age should read this section. Dear Muslim reader, you will now have to face the side of Islam which is most revolting. I hope by now you have seen that something is very wrong in Islam, which cannot be hidden by the high-toned words of the Mullahs. In spite of Arab revisionists, the Koran, Hadith, and history expose Muhammed to the serious seeker for what he really is. I hope this picture will cause you to flee into the arms of The Lord Jesus Christ who will never embarrass you like this Muhammed. Here is the foundation of Islamic sexual doctring-- Muhammed's massive libido: Sahih Bukhari Narrated Qatada: Anas bin Malik said, "The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number." I asked Anas, "Had the Prophet the strength for it?" Anas replied, "We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men)." And Sa'id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268. Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir: on the authority of his father that he had asked 'Aisha about the saying of Ibn 'Umar (i.e. he did not like to be a Muhrim while the smell of scent was still coming from his body). 'Aisha said, "I scented Allah's Apostle and he went round (had sexual intercourse with) all his wives, and in the morning he was Muhrim (after taking a bath)." Volume 1, Book 5, Number 270. Book 002, Number 0557: Hazrat Anas (Radiyallahu Anhu) reported: A Bedouin ( villager ) urinated in the mosque. Some of the persons stood up (to reprimand him or to check him from doing so), but the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu Alaihi WaSallam) said: Leave him alone; don't interrupt him. He (the narrator) said: And when he had finished, he called for a bucket of water and poured it over.
A. MUHAMMED'S LOW VIEW OF WOMEN:It is well known by criminal pathologists, every pervert that sexually offended society, first developed a very low view of women. Muhammed was no exception. Again, we will quote Muhammed in the Hadith and Koran, then we will contrast and answer him from the Bible prophets, with the emphasize on the personal lives of the prophets.
Al-Hadis, Vol. 3, p. 137, Abu Sayeed al-Khodri reported that Muhammed was talking to a group of women when he said, "... I see the majority of you will go to Hell." The women asked why, to which Muhammed responded, "You often curse and are ungrateful to your companions." He then told them they had a basic defect in their religion, to which they responded, "How?" Muhammed answered, "Is not the attestation (knowledge and witness) of a women only worth half of a man's? And that is on account of her short intelligence." Attested by agreement It is clear that Muhammed thought of all women as half-wits. This is no doubt why he forbid a man to walk between two women in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 586 (64). The two women would become the equal of the man. That would be terrible to Muhammed who saw women, mentally, as children. Perhaps that is why he often favored his nine year old wife, Ayesha, and avoided his older wives. Page 190 Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 692, Ibn Ma`sud reported from the Messenger of Allah who said, "A woman is like a private part (sex organ). When she goes out (walking) the devil casts a glance at her (in lust). Attested by Tirmizi. To Muhammed, a woman was a walking vagina, which tells us more about his own mind than about women. It is also clear that, to Muhammed, women were for one main use, copulation. This is why he required women to be completely covered from head to toe-- otherwise he had no control over his lusts. It is only reasonable that a walking vagina should be totally covered, right? This is what Al Koran, Sura 4:34 is talking about when it demands women obey their husbands and "guard what Allah has guarded" when their husbands are away. Nowhere, in Islam, in Al Koran or Al Hadith, is a Muslim man told to guard his private parts for his wife's sake! Read that again please. He can use his private parts anywhere he wants, even in sodomy with boys, without much rebuke from Allah. Some writers claim that Muhammed gave no hope to Muslim women in Paradise. Not so, and here is their hope, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 211 (60), Omme Salmah reported that the messenger of Allah said, "Any female (wife or concubine) who dies while her husband was pleased with her will enter Paradise." Attested by Tirmizi. This is clarified in the very next Hadith, no. 61, Tal qe-b-Ali reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "When a man calls his wife to satisfy his desire, let her come to him though she is occupied at the oven." Attested by Tirmizi. So a wife can be certain of heaven if she is in the act of servicing her husband when he dies. Does this not explain why Muhammed's wives fought over him every night? Copulation is a sure ticket to Paradise. David Moses or the Children of God cult also taught this, as did Joseph Smith of Mormonism. Muhammed expanded this in Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 220, Anas reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "When a woman says her five prayers, fasts her month, obeys her husband, and guards her private parts, let her enter Paradise by whichever door she likes." Attested by Abu Naveem. Muhammed gives one Gospel or Injil for women other than that they provide a pure and eager vagina to your husband. What lofty spirituality! Indeed, lofted upon the Islamic phallus! Let us hear no more of this rubbish from the Mullahs about how well Islam treats its women.
THE BIBLE'S PLACE FOR WOMENAdam, speaking of his wife, and never having had a mother or father, said in the Bible, Genesis 2:23-24, ...This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. Page 191
Adam saw his wife as the other half of himself. Muhammed never understood this blessed truth. The Apostle Peter also elevated the wife to intellectual equality with her husband in the Bible, I Peter 3:7-8, Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered. Finally, be ye all of one mind... While God asks wives to submit to their husbands for order, He does not allow the godly husband to degrade his wife's mind like Muhammed did. Mentally, she is his equal. Paul, is speaking of life in the local church fellowship of Christians, says in the Bible, Galatians 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. If Muhammed degraded women in intelligence, he raped them verbally for their sexuality. Raphael Patai points out that the pitiful thing about this rape of Muslim women, by making them sex objects, is that they are conditioned from childhood to know that their minds are useless, and their chief end is to provide sex. Since many have been circumcised, being unable to climax, they have no joy in the marriage chamber, except the thrill of knowing they have provided a depository for the mighty Islamic phallus. (FOOTNOTE 6: 121 / 125 / 1728) Is this not the result of Islam being derived from the god and goddess cults of Sumer and Babylon, where perversion was held as sacred-- and where the goddess was the slave of the god? What does the Bible say in the first book of the Prophet Moses about women? Bible, Genesis 1:27, So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Eve was not a goddess, but she bore God's image. In her original innocence, her human sexuality was beside the point with regard to her mind and spirit. In that, she bore the mark of God. If Muslim women are good only for their vaginal services, what is the image of Muhammed's Allah? Answer: phallic god? This fits the picture we saw of Allah in previous study. This blasphemy of Muhammed can be compared to the Freemason Pontiff, Albert Pike, who claimed God was a phallus and Jesus a vagina. (FOOTNOTE 7: Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike, Pub. by Supreme Council of the Southern Jurisdiction of Freemasonry, Charleston, p. 771-772) Birds of a feather, Muhammed? It is instructional that Freemasonry requires its lodges to allow a neophyte to take his oaths with his hand on the Koran if he so desires. As to the man's right over his wife, the Apostle Paul gives only one in the Bible, Ephesians 5:25, Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself (in death) for it. A true Christian husband, under the authority of The Lord Jesus Christ, has only one right-- to die for his wife. Quite a contrast to Mecca's man, eh? Here is a man, Muhammed, who sat in the corner and babbled incoherently or had headaches when he got revelation from Allah, but he thinks women are half-wits! Here is a man who prescribes blood-letting for good health, but he sees in women a mental flaw! Such is life in the world Satan creates by his pagan gods and goddesses. Page 192
The Bible gives us the picture of the ideal wife in a single sentence in Solomon's words in Proverbs 31:30, Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.-- with or without vaginal prowess!
THE
BIBLE AND Let us also discuss the standard of Jesus and Muhammed with regard to social restraint. Muhammed demanded a woman be totally covered, as with the chakur or buibui of the Middle East and East Africa today. This of course follows the doctrine that a woman is a giant private part, as we saw above. If Muhammed is correct, then he was also correct to demand a full covering of the woman, head to toe. But, is there a higher order? Jesus did not declare women to be giant private parts. Nor did he say they needed to avoid being immodest with God himself, as Muhammed did with Allah. The God who created men and women in the Bible is not able to sin, and, unlike Muhammed's Allah, Jehovah God can see his children naked without any problem. The problem comes when men and women fall in sin, as Adam and Eve did. Nakedness becomes an issue between men and women. So, God dealt with the problem of lust in the Ten Commandments. God told both men and women: Exodus 20:14 Thou shalt not commit adultery. Now, this did not take care of things too well. Men still committed adultery, and when Jesus came to earth He strengthened nearly evey one of the Ten Commandments. In this case, Jesus raised the level of the law to help prevent the sin in the mind of men: Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. You will not find such a command to women. Why? With few exceptions, women don't look on men and mentally rape them and commit adultery with them in their imagination. From the carvings in ancient Babylon to the bookstores of today, you will find mountains of representations and graphics of naked women which appeal to men, while you will find very little to "turn on" the ladies. Women do lust, but it is the nature of humanity that men lust voraciously with their eyes. The casual lust of a woman is never fired up as fast and visibly as that of a man. Jesus knew his children well when he dealt with the men only. I dealt with this carefully to show you how mongrel Muhammed's holiness is. Muhammed dealt with the object of lust. He covered it. This leaves the men to keep lusting freely with no restraint from Allah. Indeed, Muslim men are free to visit belly dancers and whores in far away cities when they are away from home. Being a camel caravan master for Kadijah before she died, Muhammed would know of the need to visit the ladies in the far away places. Also, if a woman enters an adulterous relationship, she is the guilty one, and her father or husband will kill her under Islamic law. The adulterous man is home free. He is held innocent. This absolutely proves that Muhammed was a wimp, for he would not require holiness of the chief problem-- the man. This also proves that the law of Christ on adultery, and thus the law of the Lord's Church, is the high law. Islam leaves the woman the object of lust. She is wicked if she even shows her eyes, or if she paints them and makes them appealing. Why? She wants to use that small area to draw the lust of men who pass by. The whole problem is left unsolved for both Muslim men and women. Now, the Mullahs will always use some story of an alleged Christian man and woman who committed adultery. They will also tell of how the local church involved swept this adultery under the carpet. This is because in the law of Christ, we do not kill the woman or the man. So, all parties, including the stupid church leaders, are free IN HUMAN SOCIETY to rebel against the law of Christ and condone the lust and the results of it. This is how Christendom has come to approve of abortion as well as adultery. The standard should not be what some wicked Christians do. It must be the law of Christ taken literally from the New Testament of the Bible. The Mullahs refuse to consider what Jesus taught. They hold up Jimmy Swaggart or some other adulterer. This only illustrates how weak their case really is, for they must flee from Jesus to fallen men for their argument. Let me give you a less emotional example from everyday life. (In the UK of Commonwealth nations, read "cookies" as "biscuits.") When mother bakes cookies, does she hide them? She does hide them only if she is too timid to take authority over her children. A good disciplinarian mother will set the cookies right in plain view, then she will tell the children, "Don't touch those cookies. I made them to use later." If she thinks the children need an incentive, she STILL need not cover the cookies. She adds a penalty. "Touch those cookies, and you don't go to the ball game tomorrow." Thus, God, through Jesus there in Galilee, did not hide women. He put the men under command and threat of the law. Islam is too weak to control men-- So Islam covers the cookies. Islamic men then visit the next city and find secret cookies in a bar. Or they hand a woman a handful of dates for a dowry, and they have "Muta Marriage" for a night. We end this discussion with Muhammed himself. He was a man raging with lust for women. He gave hundreds of Hadith on sexuality and semen. He was NOT about to limit his own lusts and fun, so he dumped the responsibility onto the woman. This is why, as you read above, he saw most women going to hell. And this is why the women in heaven were there only to satisfy Muhammed's libido and that of his male friends. Let us not hear this rubbish about women in Islam being treated well. Islamic women are giant walking vaginas according to Muhammed. They carry ALL the responsibility for holiness in Islam. And, they are killed by the self-righteous men if they are sexually violated, while their paramour goes on to do it again. SICK!
B. MUHAMMED ENCOURAGED WIFE BEATING Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 212 (65), Iyas-b-Abdullah reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "Don't beat the maids of Allah." Then Omar came to Muhammed and said, "Women have become daring against their husbands." So Muhammed allowed them to beat them. Attested by Abu Daud. The hadith then tells that women began to lay siege on Muhammed to mediate their beatings. The question of beating wives, is it wrong or right, is settled by Muhammed in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 215, Omar reported from the Holy Prophet who said, "No man shall be questioned for beating his wife." In the very next Hadith a woman complained to Muhammed that her husband beat her while she prayed. Muhammed told her to change her time of prayer or pray shorter prayers so that her husband could get on with the joy of beating her. (Reported by Abu Sayeed al-Kodri, Attest by Abu Daud) SEE HOW WIFE BEATING IS STILL ALLOWED IN MUSLIM NATIONS
THERE IS NO WIFE BEATING IN THE BIBLE--ONLY CARINGIt is obvious that Muhammed thought women were the stronger vessel. He made no provision for women to beat men, so we conclude that Muslim men couldn't take it. Jehovah God disagrees with this Satanic wife-beating doctrine as the Apostle Peter shows in The Bible, I Peter 3:7, "Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them (your wives) according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered." A true Christian husband will never beat his wife, in fact, Peter shows that they pray together! What a contrast with the Muslim man waiting for his wife to finish praying so that he can beat her. Lord, have mercy on such wicked souls! Solomon shows the godly man honors his wife in The Bible, Proverbs 31:28, "Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her." Page 193 Muhammed said in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 216 that all sports are evil but three: 1. Training a horse, 2. Shooting arrows, and 3. Mounting your wife. The first two relate to Jihad and killing, so we conclude that the only holy distractions which a Muslim can have are killing Christians and copulation in the bed chamber. This reminds us of the 9/11 boys, right? Pretty small world, I say. Remember this the next time you hear someone is "converting" to Islam. A friend of mine works in a prison as a guard. He reports that this mentality of violent sport and lust for women, together with the five pillars of Islam, appeal to the Black Muslims. Islam demands little real spiritual or ethical change and allows for crime to continue without Allah interfering. You must show Black men in Western countries that they will not be expected to live a holy life if they become Muslims. The white robe and kaffiya will not cover their sins before God. "Keep them barefoot and pregnant." An Ethiopian friend said this to me jokingly, when we were talking about marriage. Happily this is not the standard for all modern secularized Muslims, but it should be if they are going to obey the Prophet of Allah. Muhammed said in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 614, that there is a curse on women who wear shoes. He said shoes are only for men. In another Hadith he forbade women to use "modern" bathrooms like the Turks have. Dear Muslim reader; this is why the Mullahs do not encourage you to read the Hadith, and it explains why the Hadith is so hard for us "infidels" to find! Today, Islamic leaders want to hide these silly sayings of the Prophet. We conclude this discussion of Muhammed's treatment of women, by observing the experience of Um Kalthum, the famous lady singer of Egypt. Her singing of ballads would draw enormous crowds of men, who would openly weep as she sang. Her funeral procession was hard to believe, with two million men wailing out of control. They were so stirred by her singing that they had to deal with the fact that a women was affecting them, so, did they exalt her as a woman? No, they declared her officially to be a man. (FOOTNOTE 8: The History of the Arab Peoples, Albert Hourani, Pub. Belknap Press, Harvard, Cambridge MA, p. 340, 393 ) This was a true Muslim solution, and it shows how chauvinistic the Muslim man is. It makes a total joke out of the Muslim PhDs who teach students, in our Western universities, that women in Islam are righteously used. Let us laugh in unison. Page 194 I realized the power and subjection of Islam when my wife and I met a modern looking Muslim couple on a flight from London to Jiddah, Saudi Arabia. They had taken their son to London for eye surgery and were returning home. As we neared Jiddah, the wife got up and retreated to the restroom. Soon, she emerged covered from head to toe in a black chacour. You see, the modestly mannered and decently dressed Arab lady became a vaginal symbol, and nothing else, as we neared Jiddah and Mecca. She must be covered. This is the work of a dirty old man named Muhammed.
C. MUHAMMED AND MARRIAGE:
We now want to examine the standards of Allah for marriage as given through Islam's Prophet. Several items will be discussed under this Sub-topic. First, we need to see what goes before marriage to spoil the cleanness of sexual union in the marriage bond: CIRCUMCISION BEFORE MARRIAGEAl Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 738 Abul Malih reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "Circumcision is Sunnat (required by Islamic law) for males and optional for females." Attested by Ahmad and Baihaqi. This is in the form of a clitoridectomy (carving away of the clitoris) for girls, which makes sure they never experience climax during intercourse, or, in the case of infibulation, the girl's vulva is sewn shut until it is cut open at the time of marriage. This is what the gentle Prophet of Allah allowed! THE BIBLE AND CIRCUMCISIONThe Bible permits no circumcision of girls. Bible, Genesis 17:10, This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. The Jews never circumcised their little girls. As to the motive of keeping a girl pure, it is possible, among holy people, without the mutilation of circumcision, as Solomon shows in extolling his bride in The Bible in Song of Solomon 6:8-9, There are threescore queens, and fourscore concubines, and virgins without number. My dove, my undefiled is but one... The daughters saw her, and blessed her; yea, the queens and the concubines, and they praised her. She came to the marriage bed unmutilated by the butchery suggested by Muhammed. Nor did they have to ring a chicken's neck on her wedding night to bloody her in verification of her virginity, as North African Muslims often do. Page 195 God makes it clear in the Bible that sexual satisfaction is to be mutual in marriage. The Apostle Paul said in The Bible, I Corinthians 7:3-5, Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence (that is, make sure she is sexually satisfied): and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife (or, the wife owns her husband's sexuality). Defraud ye not one the other, (meaning, don't withhold sexual pleasure) except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency. If a man understood that his private organs were the absolute possession of his wife, and if a woman really believed her private organs were the personal property of her husband, there would be no such thing as adultery. This is the Bible standard. Muhammed falls far short of it. It is clear that God wants girls to stay pure before marriage by obeying His law against fornication. If they don't, God's solution is punishment, not mutilation of the sex organs of all the other godly girls in the vacinity. The Apostle Paul makes it clear that sexual satisfaction is not an option for the wife-- it is the husband's duty. In Islam, the only satisfaction a wife has is to know she has been used as nothing more than a good substitute for the village whore! Raphael Patai discusses this, and he says that the Muslim girl is psychologically mutilated by circumcision. At an early age, she is made to believe that sex is not ever to be pleasant for her. It is a treacherous thing Muhammed allowed. Indeed, Allah is the god of butchery to require this of a Muslim girl before marriage, and it persists to this day in Jordan, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt, and Sudan. We must also note, in all fairness, that some Coptic and Orthodox "Christians" have used this evil practice. This only shows that some alleged "Christians" are still pagan in their hearts and libidos! (FOOTNOTE 9: 121 / 124 / 1727-8) Two more things go into the preparation for marriage, that is, dowry and "being given": MUHAMMED TEACHES ABOUTDOWRY BEFORE MARRIAGEAl Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 657, Oqbah-b-A`mer reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "The most equitable of the conditions of marriage is that you should fulfil that (dowry) with which you have made private parts lawful. Agreed. In other words, the dowry is payment to use the wife's private parts. In No. 57 of p. 659, Muhammed said that a handful of barley or dates is enough. Next, we see how some sponsor is to give the bride away in order to be Sunnat, or lawful. Page 196 Al Hadis, Vol 2, p. 651, Abu Hurairah reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "No woman shall give a woman in marriage, nor shall a woman give herself in marriage. Verily, the fornicatress is she that marries by herself." Attested by Tirmizi and Abu Daud. So, the sponsorship to marriage is to be done by men only. A widow has no final authority over her daughter in Islam. THE BIBLE AND DOWRIESRegarding the dowry, in Israel it was called Mohar, and it was to compensate for the loss of the bride's services to her father as well as to provide her an endowment in case her husband died leaving her a widow. It could be paid off by work, as when Jacob worked fourteen years for his uncle Laban to pay for Leah and Rachael. The idea of paying for the use of the bride's private parts is so far from the ideals of Jehovah, the Bible, the law of Moses, and the Prophets, that it is beneath mention. In fact, in later years, the parents of the bride sent a gift with the bride to help the groom enlarge his business. This remained the personal interest of the bride in the new estate. What shall we say for a hand full of dates? Cheap religion, eh? (FOOTNOTE 10: Zondervan Pictorial Ency. see, "marriage") Then there is the business of the sponsor for the bride. The book of Ruth tells of a widowed Jew and her widowed daughter-in-law. When God brought Ruth into Boaz' life, there was no man to take charge because the husbands of Ruth and her mother-in-law were both dead. Indeed, Boaz, the future husband of Ruth, took responsibility, and the marriage later produced a son who was in the line of Christ. Of course Muhammed would call Ruth a "fornicatress," even though the illustrious Prophet of Mecca married ten widows. Again, we see that the foundation for marriage to Muhammed was to provide himself with legal sexual gratification, very little else figured into the matter. In Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 649, a girl came to Muhammed and complained that she had been married and had not enjoyed her first sexual relations with her new husband. Muhammed at once annulled the marriage. (Reported by Khansa`a-bn--Khejam and attested by Ibn Majah) Again, Muhammed's libido colored his whole judgment. Page 197
MUTA MARRIAGEDuring a Jihad expedition (holy war) Muhammed's men came to him very frustrated. As reported in Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 686, Ibn Masud reported, "We were fighting with the Messenger of Allah, and our wives were not with us. We asked the Messenger of Allah, 'Should we castrate ourselves?' The Holy Prophet forbade us from that, and then he allowed us Muta (temporary) marriage. So, we all married wives for a fixed time (usually three days) for the dowry of a piece of cloth." Attested by agreement. This is nothing but chasing whores with Allah's approval, and we note that the wife back home was purchased for life with a handful of dates, while the three-night-stand lady was worth a nice piece of cloth. The Muslim wife is a cheap commodity! For many years after Muhammed's death, the Mullahs, justifying Muta marriage, quoted the Koran, 5:87, "...Make not unlawful the good things Allah hath made lawful for you." Muta marriage remains Sunnat (lawful) in Islamic theology during Jihad, allowing what civilized people would call rape. This Islamic doctrine was at work when the Iraqi soldiers raped Kuwaiti Arab women in "Desert Storm." Muhammed, himself, once decided to divorce Saudah, his second wife, because she had become old and sexually frigid. She saved herself from being an outcast by giving her night, in the order of the bed chamber, to Ayesha whom Muhammed particularly liked. Muhammed graciously accepted. Copulation was the foundation of mercy. (Al Hadis, Vol 2, p. 682) To show Muhammed's careless attitude toward Allah's revelations, he "married" Safiya, a Jewish girl, after killing her father and her betrothed husband. There was no time for a sponsor, dowry, sending out invitations, or a wedding feast. In fact, Muhammed by-passed his own usual law of waiting until her next monthly was passed. He consummated his "marriage" to her in a sand dune with the blood and gore of Jihad still covering him, even Saifya's father's blood, no doubt. Today we call that rape, but in 628 AD, and by the Prophet of Allah, well, you see, it is just a lovely Islamic wedding ceremony. Do you suppose it had something to do with Safiya being only seventeen years old? One wonders how thrilled she was with the arrangement-- she tried to do away with Muhammed later by poisoning his lamb chops. Historians outside of Islam report that Safiya's effort to poison the Prophet did indeed result in his wasting away and his later death. Ah, the joy of "holy" matrimony! (FOOTNOTE 11: 34 / 170 / 34; 169 / 483 / 43 ) We note that, by the standard of Muhammed's own Hadith, his "marriage" to Safiya was really fornication. Page 198 Muhammed also married his wife Zainab who was divorced by another man. Who sponsored her, the former husband? Ha! In fact, according to Haji Maulana Fazlul, Muhammed had twelve wives total, and only one was a virgin when he married her! That would have been Ayesha who was nine years old when their marriage was consummated. Ten were widows and one divorced, which hints at a man who was too cheap to earn the dowry of a virgin, or was it that he wanted his women to be well experienced in the marriage chamber? Even in his sixties Muhammed's lust was great. He married two wives who refused to sleep with him, so he divorced them at once and thus sent a new message to the faithful regarding the doctrine of the groin. How many concubines he had is unknown, perhaps quite a number with muta marriage considered. (FOOTNOTE 12: Al Hadiz, Vol. 4, p. 488; 133 / 278-281 / 1973-74) For those who think I am too harsh, I shall quote Muhammed in Al Hadis, Vol. 2. p. 638, Abdur Rahman-b-Salem reported that the Apostle of Allah said, "You should marry virgins, and verily they are sweeter in tongue, more prolific in wombs, and easily satisfied with little." Attested by Ibn Majah. Muhammed was a prophet who frequently violated the very laws he foisted upon his Muslim followers. He seemed to know what the ideal was, but his libido just got the best of him at times. Only one virgin in twelve wives-- quite a failure by his own standard! This was because he refused to be made clean by the precious Blood of The Lord Jesus Christ. Since he had reduced Jesus Christ to no higher than his own level of depravity, Muhammed could not be lifted up. He had no "up"! The Bible describes those who have the truth revealed to them, yet they reject it for their own man-made religious system: The Apostle Paul states in the Bible in Hebrews 6:4-6, For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. Muhammed was informed of the truth by the Hanif, Waraqah, but he rebelled. He also was rebuked by the Jews of Medina who, after initially inviting him to Medina, laughed at him when they saw his arrogance and murderous nature. The loving Apostle John stated in the Bible, I John 3:9, Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. Muhammed did not have in him the seed of Christ's Gospel. (FOOTNOTE 13: 186 / 141 / 655; 169 / 479-480 / 41-42) So, Muhammed was not born of God, and he rejected the Son of God, The Lord Jesus Christ, as the sacrifice for his sin, so he was powerless to control his own libido. Page 199
MUHAMMED'S MARRIAGE STANDARDS We go on to examine the marriage standards of Muhammed. What do you suppose is the nicest gift a man can give his wife? Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 116, Jaber reported from the Prophet who said, "The best of what a man takes to his wife when he returns from a journey is what he gives her the first night." Attested by Abu Daud. Copulation is the sixth pillar of Islam! In fact, when her husband returns, if he has guests with him, she is even more needed, as we see in Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 217 (76), Ja`ber-b-Abdullah reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "...Verily, you have married (wives) with trust in Allah. You have got the right over them that they entertain nobody to your bed which you dislike. If they do this, give them a beating..." Attested by agreement. How nice-- is this Beverly Hills, California or Mecca? If the wife knows her husband's guest is his friend, she has to entertain him in bed, and remember, this is the way to Paradise for the Muslim woman. H.G. Wells tells of Muhammed marrying his young cousin Zainab to his adopted son Zaid. Afterwards, Muhammed married Zainab "after Zaid had accomplished his (sexual) want of her." In Al Koran 33:36-37, Allah very kindly covered for Muhammed by indicating that this incestuous wife swapping actually showed the will of Allah for the Muslim followers. Allah was very good about bailing out the faithful-- like the time Allah cleared Ayesha, when she fell behind the caravan and ended up in the bushes with another man "looking for my lost necklace." Oh yes! (FOOTNOTE 14: 169 / 483 / 43; Leviticus 18:1-20 regarding Muhammed marrying his near relative.) Muhammad's sixth wife was originally the wife of his adopted son. Muhammad conveniently received a revelation that she was to be given to him (Sura 33:36-38). It is not necessary that a prophet never have sinned. But that a prophet would receive divine messages for others, while he himself is involved in open reprehensible sin, is absurd. This is the pattern with all gurus. Rajneesh and David Moses are classic examples. It is a rare thing to find a guru or pagan prophet who was not possessed with a raging libido, and the god in charge must frequently give revelations settling disputes over the prophet's sexual excesses.
THE BIBLE ANSWERS MUHAMMED'S MARRIAGE STANDARDSWe now let the Bible writers comment on Muhammed's marriage standards. You can easily figure out that this prophet from Mecca was not in the heritage of Jehovah's prophets who went before him. Under the inspiration of the Spirit of God, Solomon wrote in The Bible, Proverbs 5:18-19, Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. Page 200 Muhammed did exactly the opposite, he started to divorce old Saudah because she couldn't light his fire anymore. What a dirty old man! How is he different from Hollywood's filthy aging stars, who divorce their wives and get a new young thing 25 years their junior? Also, what can we say about a middle aged man marrying a nine year old girl (Muhammed and Ayesha)? Solomon said in The Bible, Ecclesiastes 9:9, Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity... for that is thy portion in this life, and in thy labour which thou takest under the sun. Contentment with one wife, the wife of one's youth, means she will still be the only sweetheart of the godly man when he is ninety years old. This is the divine ideal, and the God of the Bible has no second-best plan. Jesus said in The Bible, Matthew 19:5-6, ...For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain (two) shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain (two), but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. How can thirteen people become one flesh? Impossible, so Muhammed was a violator of this holy law of the God of the Bible. We close with a very silly thought from the Hadith, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 204, Abu Hurairah reported from the Holy Prophet who said, "When a man has two wives and he does not deal equitably between them, he will stand on the Resurrection Day with one of his sides hanging down." Attested by Tirmizi, Abu Daud, and Nisai. Now, that is a nice way to exalt two wives. But, I wonder what would happen if a man had twelve wives, and he was unfair to four of them, would he come to the Resurrection Day with eight of his sides hanging down? Muhammed damned himself with that one. A godly man has his spiritual, emotional, and physical hands full living up to the divine ideal to take care of one wife. Furthermore, the baker's dozen of Muhammed could not become "one flesh" unless they were all lesbians.
D. MUHAMMED ON DIVORCE:A prophet must indeed be an example for the believers. Thus, Muhammed, by example, approved battlefield rape, temporary marriage, child brides of nine years old, and, in this subject of divorce, he nearly divorced Saudah for not responding to him sexually. Allah once again covered it all with the following Hadith-- he overlooks the sin of divorce which he, Allah, has made lawful. This IS NOT the God of the Bible. Page 201 Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 705, Abu Hurairah reported that the Prophet said, "Every divorce is lawful except the divorce of an idiot or someone deranged in intellect." Attested by Tirmizi. But then we find that Allah hates the very thing he made to be lawful: Same source, p. 702, Ibn Omar reported that the Apostle of Allah said, "The most detestable of lawful things to Allah is divorce. Attested by Abu Daud. You may ask, "How can Allah do this?" Here is the answer: Same source, p. 706, Ibn Abbas reported, "There is expiation in unlawful things: Verily there is an excellent example for you in the Apostle of Allah." Attested by agreement. Muhammed is thus the example of how Allah changes his own standards if you are high enough in the Islamic hierarchy. And, proving that Allah creates and tolerates evil and divorce: Same source, p. 708, Ma`uz-b-Jabal reported that the messenger of Allah said to him, "Allah created nothing on the face of the earth more disliked by him than divorce." Attested by Darqutni. Please send for that one by mail if you don't believe me. Allah, in association with Satan, invented the evil of divorce, made it lawful, and his dear prophet, Muhammed, boldly exemplified the doctrine.
THE BIBLE REJECTSMUHAMMED'S DIVORCE DOCTRINEThe prophet Malachi said in The Bible, Malachi 2:16, For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away (divorce): for one covereth violence (adultery) with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously (with your wife). The God of the Bible never approved of divorce, and He never once used a man, as a prophet or leader, who had divorced his wife. According to Jesus Christ, the only reason divorce was tolerated in Moses' law, was because of the hardness of your (Jewish) hearts... but in the beginning (in the Garden of Eden) it was not so. Bible, Matthew 19:8. God created the first family, and Adam, after God married him to Eve, gave us the doctrine of marriage which allowed for no divorce as we see in The Bible, Genesis 2:24, Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. Let us give Jesus Christ, the righteous Judge, the last verdict against Muhammed's evil divorce doctrine: Bible, Luke 16:18, Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery. Page 202 So, Jesus finds Muhammed guilty of adultery on two counts: First, Muhammed married Khadijah, his first wife, after she had been divorced twice. To Jehovah God, Khadijah was no better than a whore or belly dancer. Second, Muhammed tried to put away his wife Saudah, and he married his foster son Zaid's wife Zainab, who may not have even been divorced by Zaid. It is a curious thing to me that Muhammed and all of the Mullahs, when they mention Jesus, suffix His name with "PBUH," or "praise be upon him." Do they not understand that they are blessing the Son of God, who has already damned them to hell for their evil doctrines which they got from Haji Allah? If The Lord Jesus Christ were to walk into Mecca physically tomorrow morning, the Muillahs would order His throat to be slit. As to Allah inventing evil, or making laws he hated, we need to show that Jehovah cannot do this. The Bible, James 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: God will not, and cannot, tempt men to do evil, especially his own children. The Bible, James 1:17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. 18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. God created man to be the first fruit in the image of God in the creation. God has no evil in him, so he will not arrange for man, who shows the image of God, to do evil. Man, like Muhammed, sins of his own will. To blame is on Allah is optional for the Muslim, but not for the Jew of the Christian.
E. MODESTY, MUHAMMED'S ANSWERTO ARAB SODOMY: Before I go on let me make something clear. There is no way to present the historic Muhammed and be gentle about it. The Mullahs who are honest with themselves must admit that Muhammed's sayings and actions are, at times, embarrassing. Dear reader, my case is not against you, and I DO NOT assume that you live in the disgusting life-pattern which you have just read, but you MUST see this prophet for just what he was, a dirty old man. It is not enough to say, "Well, Islam has changed." The majority of the followers of every religion change with time, but the founder of a religion and his zealous followers are the ones who hold to the pure original teachings. That is what we are dealing with in this book. The next section is perhaps the lowest point in this book, but it must be considered if you are to have the truth. The profane side in Islam and the glorious side of life in Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of the Jehovah, will now contrast in the extreme. Please read on. As I read the Hadith I realized that Muhammed was absolutely obsessed with modesty. This was very different from the Arabs in Mecca, as well as the Bedhoin of the deserts in Muhammed's day. Let me illustrate with a selection of Hadith, which more accurately reveals the character of Muhammed than the Koran. Afterward, we will discuss other Hadith and the Koran to show what is at the root of Muhammed's modesty. This section is very explicit, please do not let children read it. Dear Christian, you will appreciate your HOLY Bible in a new way after reading this "sacred" garbage. Page 203 Here then is the modesty of Muhammed, the modesty of a man with a raging phallic complex: Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 680, No. 44, "When one of you comes to the privy, he shall not touch his penis with his right hand." Reported by Abu Qatada, Attested by agreement. In ancient times the custom was to keep the right hand clean because one ate and greeted with it, but the next Hadith shows that, in Muhammed's case, there was more to this than cultural cleanliness. Al Hadis, Same, p. 685, No. 65, "Whenever Muhammed passed urine he used to cleanse his penis." Reported by Hakam-b-Sufyan and Attested by Abu Daud and Nisai. Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 688, No. 236, Abul Juhaim-b-Hares reported, "I saw the Prophet when he was urinating. I saluted him, but he did not return the salute... He struck it (his penis) with a stick, rubbed his hands on the wall and then his face, and saluted me." Sharhi Sunnat. This shows that Muhammed was terrified of touching his organ. Ask any psychologist what this implies. When Muhammed relieved himself it was a spiritual event. In Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 679, When Muhammed entered the privy he said, "O Allah, I seek refuge from male and female spirits." Reported by Anas, attested by agreement. We see that Muhammed feared being sexually molested by devils. There are several Hadith where Muhammed discussed male and female devils (incubi and succubi) molesting people in their sleep. Regarding wiping one's bottom in the privy, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 680-681, "Whoever cleanses (after elimination) with stones or collyrium, he shall use an odd number... and whoever comes to the privy, he shall conceal himself, even using a heap of sand, because the devil plays with the private parts of the children of Adam..." Reported by Abu Hurairah, Attested by Abu Daud and Ibn Majah. Remember, to a Muslim, this Hadith is just as authoritative a revelation as the Bible or the Koran. To you who witness to Muslims, this is a good reason for never starting with the "scripture" of Islam to get a Muslim to listen to a Christian witness. Indeed, all over the world, Christian ministers try to witness to Muslims by using both the Koran and the Bible. Only a fool would take the thoughts of Muhammed as a starting point to lead to Jesus Christ and the Gospel. Do you see Muhammed's terror of his own sexuality? On page 682 in the above source he forbid cleansing oneself with bones because they are the food of devils. The Jinn, or devils, were so impressed with Muhammed's tender mercies toward them that a group of them converted to Islam. Read about it in Sura 72 of the Koran. Could Satan believe the Koran and become a believer? The answer is, YES, since he is the god of Islam. But, I digress, so back to Muhammed's sexual complex. Page 204 To show clearly that this man had a fixation of guilt for his sexuality, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 684, No. 63, Ayesha reported that when the Prophet came out of the privy, he used to say, "O Allah, grant thy forgiveness." Attested by Tirmizi and Ibn Majah. He saw in his natural God-given elimination processes, and in his sexual organs, sin and guilt which he could not avoid. Nowhere in the Bible does a godly man show any such terror or guilt for elimination. The only "privy" doctrine, in the sixty-six books of the Bible, is purely a matter of sanitation, as the prophet Moses teaches in The Bible, Deuteronomy 23:13, "And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee:" In other words, don't pollute nature. (By the way, God didn't need to consult with the Green cultists to get His sanitation doctrine correct.) Muhammed feared being seen by men when he was urinating, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 685, Omar reported that the Prophet saw him standing while urinating and said, "O Omar, don't pass urine while standing, so I never again passed urine while standing." Attested by Tirmizi. Also, No. 69 on the same page, Ayesha reported (after Muhammed's death) "Whoever tells you that the Prophet passed urine while standing is lying to you..." Attested by Ahmed and Tirmizi. This also shows how Muhammed and Allah did not know the physiology of man. A man evacuates his bladder better if he is standing to urinate. Urinating while squatting can result in urine being left in the bladder, and the result can be infection. The God of the Bible did not call on his people to take such risks. It is interesting to note how the early Mullahs used Ayesha, wife of the Prophet of Allah, after the death of Muhammed. One gets a mental picture of several dirty-minded old Mullahs, sitting around an evening fire in Arabia, pumping Ayesha for the grossest details of her bedroom and bathroom experiences with Muhammed-- but only for the edification of the faithful, you understand. Muslim friend, did the Mullahs tell you to carry a leather shingle? Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 686, no. 74, Abdur Rahman-b-Hasannah reported, "the messenger of Allah came out to the privy with a leather shield in his hand. He put it down, took his seat, and urinated against it. We said, 'Look, the Prophet urinates just like a woman...' The Prophet said, 'Don't you know what happened to the ruler of Israel? When urine fell on their garments they used to cut it out with scissors, so the ruler of Israel prohibited them, and God punished him for it..." Attested by Abu Daud, Ibn Majah, and Abu Musa. Three attestations at the end indicate that this is a major doctrine. The moral truth is, urine defiles a man, so either carry a leather shingle to urinate against, or cut out the parts of your clothes where urine splashes. Furthermore; this notion about the ancient Jews is pure fantasy-- it is nowhere found in the Bible. Page 205 If you are a Muslim man, and you are not cutting all the splash points out of your trousers, you will be punished. Also, how would a baby's diaper be washed and reused? It would be full of holes after cutting away the urine soaked area made during the first use. This potty doctrine leaves much room for theological debate! I shall leave that to the Cairo Mullahs. I say that this doctrine has holes in it. In spite of all of this male modesty, Muhammed permitted strangers to urinate against the inside wall of the mosque in Mecca, Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 390-391, No. 94-95. While he demanded cleansing from human urine and semen, he claimed that animal urine was harmless, and water from polluted wells was all right to use for cleansing ablutions, "Verily, water does not become impure." Al Hadis, Vol 3, p. 806, No. 206 and Vol. 1, p. 710, (141); p. 715 (159); p. 722 (245). So, we conclude that his potty doctrine had to do, not with sanitation, as we might find in Leviticus in the Bible. Rather; it was a reflection of Muhammed's terror of his male organ and the natural elimination processes. Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 686, No. 72, Abu Ayyub, Jaber and Anas reported that (during a mosque sermon) the Prophet read the verse from the Koran, 9:108, "...There is a mosque whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety... In it are men who love to be purified, and god loveth them who make themselves pure." In the congregation before him were some of the Ansars, and the Prophet asked them, "Allah praised you for your cleanliness. What is your (secret for) cleanliness?" The Ansars answered, "We make ablution for prayer, and we take a bath to make ablution for seminal emissions." The Prophet said, "It is this that (cleanses), so keep on doing this." Attested by Ibn Majah. Muhammed required bathing after all emissions of semen, even involuntary night emissions. In Leviticus in the Bible, seminal emissions made a man unclean in the context of sanitation, not sexual dirtiness. To Muhammed, semen was evil because it reminded him of his powerful guilt produced by his raging sexual lust. In the same source, p. 705, No. 124-125; Ayesha, the wife of Muhammed, goes into a very detailed discussion describing when a man is defiled by semen and at what point the penetration of the male organ defiles a woman. In the same source, p. 719, No. 168 she tells how she scraped dried semen off of the prophet's clothes. Do you see how the filthy mind of Muhammed dirtied the women in Islam? Do you see what total disregard Islam has for the cloak of modesty, which Jehovah gave to Eve, the first women? The Apostle Paul says in The Bible, I Timothy 2:9, In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; Page 206 What little modesty the nine year old Ayesha had was raped from her when a middle-aged prophet "consummated" marriage with the little girl. After the prophet's death, the Muslim Mullahs spiritually and mentally raped Ayesha again to establish the bedroom doctrine of Islam. Such a civilized religion! By the way, I have held back the most explicit of Ayesha's Hadith from this account for propriety. Bible, Matthew 6:34, Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof. Again I digress-- back to the phallic complexes of the Prophet. You might like to know that Muhammed even thought that kissing would defile a person, as we see in Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 672 (385), "Verily, kissing belongs to touch, so make ablution for it." He fails to tell us if he means for men greeting men or just for husband and wife. Perhaps the Cairo Mullahs should discuss that doctrine also. The Prophet of Allah also required ablution cleansing for passing air, but only if you could hear it, and he once preached a whole sermon against passing air in the mosque. It seems that the faithful were making sport of this, and the Prophet was offended. Is it not peculiar that the Bible prophets never took up this timeless message of truth? Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 205 (50); p. 657 (29). The road ahead gets rougher, so please brace yourself. We now look at Muhammed's perfume doctrine in which Muhammed showed some rather feminine traits. Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 616-617, No. 54, Abu Hurairah reported that the Messenger of Allah said, "The perfume of a man is that which has a fragrance but it has no color. The perfume of a woman has a color, but it must not have an odor." Attested by Tirmizi and Nisai, while in the next Hadith, No. 55, Walid-b-Oqbah reported that the Messenger of Allah had a bag he carried from which he perfumed himself. Attested by Abu Daud. We see that the prophet was a real dandy, as far as male appeal was concerned, while the ladies were to just go on smelling of sweat, the heat of the desert, and the smoke of cooking fires. In Mecca, where water was scarce and it was a major chore for a lady to get really clean, this was cruel. To put this feminine zeal for perfume into context, perhaps we should look at Muhammed's strange and inconsistent way of showing affection for men as we read in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, No. 38, Anas reported that a man asked the prophet, "When a Muslim meets his brother how should he greet him? Should he nod his head?" "No" said the Prophet. "Should he embrace and kiss him?" "No" said the Prophet. "Should he take his hand and shake it?" "Yes" replied the Prophet. Attested by Tirmizi. Page 207 Now, that is very clear, but we note that the Prophet Muhammed didn't keep his own law, as is obvious in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 579, No. 42, Ayesha reported, "Zaid-b-Haresah came to Medina while the Messenger of Allah was in my house. When he came to the door, the Prophet stood up with nothing on... and embraced and kissed him." Attested by Tirmizi. And in the same source, No. 44, Shabi reported that, "the Holy Prophet met Ja`far-b-Abi Taleb, embraced him and kissed him in the place between the eyes." Attested by Abu Daud. I have seen pictures of Muslim men embracing with mouth to mouth kissing, and very affectionately. I know of no other culture that allows this. Strictly cultural, you say? Muhammed forbid it, but he personally indulged such intimacy. Muhammed even drew Allah into his personal phobias as he showed in Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 706, No. 130, Ya`la reported that the Messenger of Allah saw a naked man bathing in a field, so he ascended the pulpit (of the mosque) and said.... "Allah is bashful, keeper of secrets. He loves bashfulness and concealment. So when any of you takes a bath, he shall conceal himself (from Allah)." Attested by Aby Daud and Nisai. In other words, Allah has also got a problem trying to keep his libido under control, so don't show your nakedness to Allah. Pagan religions tend to cast their gods in the image of fallen man. This is most graphically seen in Greek mythology, and Muhammed seems to have picked it up. This modesty of Allah is better understood as we read Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 494, No. 255, Abu Sayeed al-Khodri reported that the Messenger of Allah was much more bashful than the virgins within their head-veils. Attested by agreement. The God of the Bible, Elohim, created Adam and Eve naked, and God had no problem with their nakedness, Bible, Genesis 2:25, And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed. They were not ashamed because God, their only friend in the whole earth, was not "bashful" or ashamed of them. Men need to hide only from a lusting god like Allah. Later, in the account of the first sin and fall of Eve and Adam, Bible, Genesis 3:6-11, And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? Page 208 It was inconceivable, to the dirty mind of Muhammed, that a holy God could possibly look on a naked woman without lust. This is a very powerful statement on the character of Haji Allah, the filthy god from Babylon. Like Prophet, like god. Muhammed's uncharacteristic male behavior, terror of his phallus, zeal for perfume, and terror of being defiled by women, sounds strangely familiar to anyone who has lived in a culture favorable to sodomy. In order to put this into better perspective, let us review his teaching about Paradise and the sexual banquet prepared there by Allah. In Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 172, No. 34, Ali reported that the Apostle of Allah said, "There is in Paradise a market wherein there will be no buying or selling, but will consist of men and women. When a man desires a beauty, he will have intercourse with them." Attested by Tirmizi. We looked at this in a previous chapter comparing the Paradise of Islam with the Heaven of the Christian. Now, we have the whole perspective, that is, Islam leaves the way open for sodomy, if not in this life, well, certainly in the next. Young men are available for the sexual pleasure of the men in Paradise, and Muhammed saw no problem with this, indeed he looked forward to it. My contention is that Muhammed was tormented by sodomite sexual temptations this side of Paradise. There is no other explanation for his obsessive fear of his own sexuality, his feeling of sexual defilement by women, desire to smell sweet, and his elimination paranoia. None of these were culturally derived from the local Arab population, NONE!! The local Arabs found Muhammed's potty doctrines novel, amusing, and confusing, nor were those doctrines derived from the Bible or Jews or Christians with whom Muhammed had come in contact. How could he be both heterosexual and have sodomite fears? This is very common where men are driven mightily by lust. The result is that they have to avoid seeing the nakedness of other men because their lusts are inflamed by ANY sexual images, even the male organ. They also struggle with temptations of masturbation, which need not cause great guilt, but, in their case, remind them of their fantasies and temptations. So, they are in terror of touching their own organ. Such was the experience of Muhammed, the Prophet of Haji Allah. Sigmund Freud would have found Muhammed an interesting case study. Certainly, Muhammed is to be pitied, and I am NOT saying he overtly did sodomite acts, but he was a frustrated man whose libido was inflamed from dawn to dusk. According to Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 682-683, No. 106, Ayesha reported that the Prophet of Allah enquired as he was dying, "Where shall I pass tomorrow, where shall I pass tomorrow?" He was hoping it would be me (Ayesha), so his other wives gave him permission to use their turns so he could be with me (Ayesha) until he died. Attested by Bukhari. Muhammed's dying words were to enquire where he could satisfy his lust. No Christian Apostle or Old Testament Prophet ever went out of this life at this low level. Page 209 To conclude this section we observe that it is the travesty of the ages that over one billion Muslims have been subjected to every word Muhammed breathed in the Koran and these puerile Hadith, which the Mullahs hide from the faithful. Also, what sorrow has been wrecked in the lives of millions of little Muslim girls as their libidos have been twisted by filthy conversation and their bodies mutilated by circumcision. What evil frustrations Muslim young men have experienced as they live constantly on the edge of defilement, before and after marriage. Baby boys have been sexually fondled by their mothers, raised from childhood to lust sexually for women as a divinely given imperative, only to have their God-given sexual desires deformed by the prophet with copious rules and limitations. The result is the age-old alternative to the frustrated sinner-- sodomy. In the Middle East the punishment for stealing is to have the hand cut off. To this day, in a number of Muslim countries, the punishment for adultery or fornication is to have the corresponding offending member cut off. This certainly has a way of discouraging heterosexual fornication. Oddly enough though, there is more shame in Arab cultures for masturbation than for sodomy, so sodomy is the diversion of choice in the large Islamic urban populations. (FOOTNOTE 15: 121 / 122 / 1727) Dear Muslim father, why would you want your young daughter or son exposed to these wicked doctrines? Suppose your children were to read the Hadith and find the things you have just read, or worse, the Hadith I could not include because they are just too filthy. It is NOT cowardly to flee from the religious defilement of Islam, indeed, it is the manly thing to do. You will find, in The Lord Jesus Christ and The Holy Bible, the promise of a reward to those who leave their sin and confess faith in the pure teachings of Christ who died on the cross to cleanse you of all sin. You will also save your children from much sorrow. Before we move on, let us be sure we understand what the God of the Bible thinks of sodomy. It is not a genetic matter, nor can we blame someone else. Here are the words of the Apostle Paul: The Bible, Romans 1:27, And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. Page 210
The teaching regarding the use of young men sexually by Muslim men in Paradise shows the true lust in the heart of both Muhammed and many Islamic spiritual leaders. It is no wonder that Islam has no power to stop sodomy in its followers, indeed, the Dervishes exalt it. They even prophecy that the Madhi, "Christ," will return to be born of a man, thus explaining their baggy trousers which they hope will be filled with the incarnation of the Madhi. This then justifies their sodomy. Prudence prevents us from discussing the birthing physiology of such fantasies any further, but the reader might sit back and reflect-- just how far can a twisted sinful mind go? (FOOTNOTE 16: Reported by an Arab Christian) You see, when a man leaves the God-given use of the woman, that is, one husband and one wife for life, then the lusting man loses his satisfaction with God's natural gift of sexuality. The same can happen when a man has too many wives to satisfy. Muhammed may well have gotten bored with perpetual copulation and yearned for something more exciting. The result is this-- novel and sodomite forms of lust come to the mind of a man who has grown bored with God's provision of one wife. As the ancient Muslims used hashish to get a sexual rush, even so today, sodomites, in the bath houses of the present world, use nitrites. (FOOTNOTE 17: Magic and the Supernatural, Maurice Bessy, Spring Books, London, p. 241) The toys and trappings change, but the heart of man is the same "dirty rag" that it was in Isaiah's day, Bible, Isaiah 64:6, But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousness are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
John Gunther in "Inside Africa" describes how the Berbers of Morocco hate the Arabs, though both groups are Muslim. The reason is that the Berbers are fiercely heterosexual, and Gunther tells us that the Arab Muslims are very much given to the "vice" of sodomy. (FOOTNOTE 18: 57 / 66 / 1703) The point is clear-- sodomy is a vice common to many Arab Muslims, and this is well known to anyone familiar with Middle Eastern life. I have had Arab converts to Christ warn me of this as I told them I had a zeal to witness to Arabs. They were concerned for my sons. This picture is still very real in Saudi Arabia where the desert Bedhoin are totally clean of sodomy, while the city-dwelling Arab men of the Hadhramaut, Riyadh, and the northern cities, Mecca and Jiddah, are well known for their lust for young boys. (FOOTNOTE 19: 160 / 125 / 1772) John Gunther tells us that most Europeans who convert to Islam are sodomites, so Western fathers ought to think twice before they cozy up to the Mullahs. Do you want this way of life for your son or daughter? (FOOTNOTE 20: 57 / 64 / 1702 ) Page 211
Also, the fact that most white Western converts to Islam are sodomites puts Islamic "evangelism" into perspective. Imam Chirri's book tells of the conversion of an American to Islam. Could this be merely the account of a sodomite shopping for new friends. We are not deceived by Muhammed's modesty. Any sodomite who has been born again by the precious Blood of The Lord Jesus Christ, and truly delivered, will tell you that a man given to a sodomite mind must not let himself be caught in the vicinity of naked heterosexual men during elimination or bathing. Embarrassing peculiarities transpire in the lower parts and the eyes, leaving the sodomite glaringly exposed. Muhammed's modesty in the Hadith resembles nothing in the Bible where the prophets, writers, and Apostles had virtually nothing to say on the topic of personal male modesty. Why? Answer: They were not in terror of their god-given sexuality, indeed, we have seen that it was a blessing in the context of God's marriage arrangements. (FOOTNOTE 21: Dear Muslim friend, please read, in the Bible, The Song of Solomon. You will see the freedom and beauty of sexuality between one husband and one wife without the phallic terror of Muhammed.) When David's sinful lust took over, he went up on the roof top of the palace and peeked at a lady bathing down below, not at some man's calves or private organs. (II Samuel 11:1-3) It was certainly sinful and wicked, and David was chastened for it, but never did a Bible prophet or man of God enter into sodomy or show any temptations for it. I do not pretend that this section has been a light matter, but I feel that the worst in Islam has been hidden long enough. Christian readers, please be gentle with Muslims whom you meet when discussing this matter. They have been sheltered from this reality by the Mullahs, and this information will be a great shock to them. Many Muslim men today are heterosexual, monogamous, and would never treat their daughter or wife as Ayesha was treated. They may tell you, as one Muslim told me in Dearborn, "I am a secularized Muslim." This is their way of putting a disclaimer on these degrading aspects of Muhammed and Islam, and it is largely because the salt of Christianity in modern life has simply ruled out much of Muhammed's depravity. However; it is very fair and useful to expose the life and mind of the prophet Muhammed so that "secularized" Muslims will complete the journey from Muhammed to The Lord Jesus Christ who will never embarrass them. Page 212
CONCLUSIONS
TO: The copulation and elimination complexes of Muhammed have made the Mullahs of Islam very nervous. Their response, when these things are exposed, is classic to the Arab and Jihadic nature of Islam, they attack. I quote Ahmed Deedat (perhaps the most vitriolic Islamic antagonist ever to attack Christianity, The Lord Jesus Christ, and the Bible) from his book, Christ in Islam. Deedat said of Billy Graham, "Billy Graham dramatized this verse (Matthew 1:18 regarding the virgin birth) in front of 40,000 people in King Park, Durban, South Africa, with his index finger sticking out and swinging his outstretched arm from right to left, he said...." (FOOTNOTE 22: Disclaimer: I want it to be clear that I do not endorse Billy Graham's journey to the Roman Catholic Whore. This is only given to illustrate Deedat's total lack of ethics.) Deedat's accusation was clearly meant to imply that Graham was making some phallic use with his index finger. Perhaps this is taboo in South Africa with indigenous people, but Deedat shows how desperate the Mullahs are to dirty Jesus Christ and Christians. He falsely accused Graham of making sexual gestures. In his debates, Deedat also tries to make Jesus Christ into a bastard, then he magnanimously adds, "Praise Be Upon Him." Come on Ahmed and you Mullahs, you can do better than that. Tell us about Muhammed's phallic fantasies (Shame Be Upon Him). (FOOTNOTE 23: Video: Deedat / Swaggart debate; 30 / 23 / 327 ) We conclude that Muhammed was a dirty old man, and copulation is the sixth pillar of Islam. The God of the Bible did nothing to chasten Muhammed. When a true servant of Elohim, God of the Bible, gets dirty and vulgar, God punishes him, as the Apostle Paul taught in The Bible, Hebrews 12:6, For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. Muhammed was exalted in the Islamic model, never chastened by Jehovah God. The Bible says that God hates divorce, and Jesus Christ limited men to only one wife. Bible men, who gathered numerous wives and concubines, always fell from God's blessing and power. Both Solomon and David, in their later years, suffered great sorrow because of their multiple wives and sexual excesses. The Bible book, Song of Solomon, was written when Solomon was right with the Lord, and in that account, we find only one woman and one man who were madly in love with each other. Muhammed broke all of these standards, but he died without one word of rebuke from Allah, in fact, Allah even helped him set up a rotation for his wives so that he could satisfy them all. Muhammed, his wives, and Haji Allah were running a brothel in Mecca which resembled nothing we find in the Bible. This is another proof that Allah and Jehovah God of the Bible could not possibly be the same characters. Page 213 We read in The Bible, II Timothy 4:3-4, For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears. And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. Mecca's fables, like The Arabian Nights, are fired by sexual fantasy. Dear reader, it is possible to be sexually clean, to be delivered from evil sexual thoughts and lust, and Jesus is the example. The Bible says, regarding sexual temptation, in Hebrews 4:15, For we have not an high priest (Jesus Christ) which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. "...yet without sin." The Lord Jesus Christ knows how you are tempted, but, unlike you or me, Jesus refused every temptation, so He knows how to give you power over your lusts. He can give you power to control your mind, even if you were raised by your mother and father to think dirty, lustful thoughts. The clean and pure Gospel of Jesus Christ is the alternative to Muhammed's powerless and dirty Injil. It is impossible to keep the lusts permitted by Islam and, at the same time, have Jesus. You must choose one or the other. Will you come out of Muhammed's degraded sensuality and into the glorious life in The Lord Jesus Christ? I pray that you will. Kneel even now, and, with your back toward Mecca, submit to God, El-Elyon, in the name of The Lord Jesus Christ. He is waiting to hear from you and He calls you to His salvation as you can see in the Bible text below. Please do not neglect Chapter Twenty-Six on the Gospel, Al Injil ya Yitha.
Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden,and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. Spoken by The Lord Jesus Christ in The Bible, Matthew 11:28-30 Page 214 LINKS:
|
spchk
ed-03